Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30346 (JHR)

MORIAS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. RIPUNJAY PRASAD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/895/2025 · 2025-08-14

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23755 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 895 of 2025 Morias Infrastructure Private Limited, a body corporate, duly incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 having its branch office at 208, Pustak Bhawan Complex, Court Road, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi-834001 through its Director Mr. Ripunjay Prasad Singh, son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Singh, by occupation business, resident of Pustak Bhawan Complex, Court Road, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi - 834001, Jharkhand. ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Director General of Police (D.G.P.), Jharkhand at Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O.-Saheed Chowk, Ranchi, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O.-Saheed Chowk, Ranchi, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi. 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Lalpur, P.O.-Lalpur, P.S.-Lalpur, District- Ranchi. 6. Ramesh Oraon, son of Ghurja Oraon, resident of Karamtoli, P.O. and P.S.- Lalpur, District- Ranchi. 7. Shiv Charan Oraon, son of Late Mange Oraon, resident of Village-Brambe, P.O.-Brambe, P.S.-Mandar, District-Ranchi. 8.Rajesh Kumar Verma, son of Late Jagdish Narayan Verma, resident of Karamtoli, P.O. and P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi. .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Ms. Diksha Rani, Advocate Mr. Riday Mukherjee, Advocate For the Resp.- State : Mr. Zaid Imam, A.C to SC-VII 05/14.08.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition bringing all the facts. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State does not object. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty