MORIAS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. RIPUNJAY PRASAD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/895/2025 · 2025-08-14
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30346 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30346 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23755
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 895 of 2025
Morias Infrastructure Private Limited, a body corporate, duly incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 having its branch office at 208, Pustak Bhawan Complex, Court Road, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi-834001 through its Director Mr. Ripunjay Prasad Singh, son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Singh, by occupation business, resident of Pustak Bhawan Complex, Court Road, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi - 834001, Jharkhand.
….........Petitioner(s)
Vrs.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Director General of Police (D.G.P.), Jharkhand at Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O.-Saheed Chowk, Ranchi, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O.-Saheed Chowk, Ranchi, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi.
5. The Officer-in-Charge, Lalpur, P.O.-Lalpur, P.S.-Lalpur, District- Ranchi.
6. Ramesh Oraon, son of Ghurja Oraon, resident of Karamtoli, P.O. and P.S.- Lalpur, District- Ranchi.
7. Shiv Charan Oraon, son of Late Mange Oraon, resident of Village-Brambe, P.O.-Brambe, P.S.-Mandar, District-Ranchi. 8.Rajesh Kumar Verma, son of Late Jagdish Narayan Verma, resident of Karamtoli, P.O. and P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi. .......... Respondent(s)
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Ms. Diksha Rani, Advocate
Mr. Riday Mukherjee, Advocate For the Resp.- State : Mr. Zaid Imam, A.C to SC-VII
05/14.08.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition bringing all the facts.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State does not object.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
A.Mohanty