Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30344 (JHR)

MD. MUSLIM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/967/2025 · 2025-04-23

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12071 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 967 of 2025 Md. Muslim, S/o Late Md. Ijhar, R/o Tanda Basti, P.O. Katras Bazar, P.S. Katrasgarh, District- Dhanbad. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, having office at Dhnabad, P.O. & P.S.- Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhanbad having office at Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.- Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 4. The Circle Officer, Dhanbad, having office at Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.- Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 5. Ibrahim Ansari, S/o Late Yakub Ansari 6. Md. Nijay Ansari, S/o Late Yakub Ansari 7. Md. Dildar Ansari, S/o Ibrahim Ansari 8. Md. Yunus Ansari, S/o Basarat Ansari [ 5 to 8 are R/o Shyamdih, P.O. & P.S. Katras, District- Dhanbad]. … …. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar Trivedi, Advocate M/s Deepak Kr. Singh & Rohit Kr. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG.III ------ Order No. 03 / Dated : 23.04.2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to make necessary correction in the Cause Title of the Respondent(s) of the instant Writ Petition. 2. This writ petition has been filed for correction in the online entries made in the revenue records which is at variance with the entries made in the Register-II. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that he has purchased the land situated at Mouza No. 249, Khata No. 15 having Old Khata No.32, Plot No.37 having Old Plot No.28, ad-measuring an area of 12 decimals, Anchal- Baghmara, District –Dhanbad from one Rameshwar Rai through a sale-deed executed on 04.08.2010 vide Deed No.11636. After the said purchase, the land was duly mutated in the land records in the name of the petitioner. 4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that discrepant entries have been 2025:JHHC:12071 2 made in the online revenue records and for correction of the entries, the petitioners filed a representation before Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad on 29.12.2023, but the said representation has not so far been disposed of, nor any correction has been made. 5. Under the circumstance, respondent nos. 4 [Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad] is directed to dispose of the representation dated 29.12.2023 by a reasoned order and make correction of the entries in the online records within eight weeks of the order, failing which, the respondent no. 4 will be liable to pay cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner for causing undue delay in the matter. Writ petition stands disposed of. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad (Respondent No. 4) for its compliance. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/Pawan/ -