- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4245 WP No. 18697 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 18697 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA RAJYA BADAVARA HITHARAKSHANA VEDIKE (REG), WELFARE ASSOCIATION, IST MAIN ROAD, NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, WHITEFIELD POST, BENGALURU-560 066, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT STATE PRESIDENT SRI. M. ANNAYYA, REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMALANATHAN P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT XHCM +PXC, K G ROAD, NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4245 WP No. 18697 of 2022 SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 009 3. TAHASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, 2M3R + WR5, DIESEL LOCO SHED RD, DURAVANI NAGAR, KRISHNARAJAPURA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 036 4. M/S. SAI BLOSSOM ENCLAVE, BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, 2Q89 + X8X, KANNAMANGALA ROAD, SEEGEHALLI, KRISHNARAJAPURA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 067, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR 5. M/S. SANMATHI HOMES, BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, NO.8/2, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 042, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR DEEPAK SETHI. THE R4 AND R5 ARE REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES REGISTRATION ACT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4245 WP No. 18697 of 2022 MANDAMUS , AND DIRECT THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 29.08.2022 AND 30.08.2022 , PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES H1 , H2 , H3 AND H4 , AND TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE 4TH AND 5TH RESPONDENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner seeks to espouse a public cause and therefore the petition in the present form cannot be maintained. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, by reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation, if it so desires. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE TIN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT:SNN