2025:HHC:39096 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.395 of 2019 Decided on: 19.11.2025 _________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Mr. P.K. Verma, Learned Vice Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions of original counsel Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, received from the petitioner submits that due to subsequent events, the matter has been rendered infructuous and the petitioner is not interested to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement Taken on Record]. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by the opposite parties. In view of the above, the instant petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:39096 - 2 - rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 19, 2025 [Shivender]