2025:JHHC:20042 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 124 of 2022 M/s. A.D. Pall Bros, situated at R. Ali Building Premises, Main Road Ranchi, through its Partners Asad Pall and Zeeshan Ahmed Pall … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi 4. The Town Planner, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi 5. Ranchi Regional Development Authority, Ranchi 6. Md. Shams Alam, S/o Late Khurshaid Alam, R/o R. Ali Building, Main Road, Ranchi 7. M/s. APJ Express, having its office at Peepee Compound, Main Road, Ranchi, through its partner Mr. Gurbir Singh … … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate Mr. Kirtivardhan, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Singh, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, AC to GA-III For the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Karbir, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, Advocate ----- I.A. No. 3054 of 2025 07/22.07.2025 The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition in terms with the settlement arrived at between the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 6 (landlord) and the respondent no. 7 (developer) on 10.02.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a settlement was arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent nos. 6 and 7 on 10.02.2025. As per the terms of the settlement, the petitioner has agreed to shift on absolute ownership basis to Shop Nos. 13 and 14 on the ground floor of the new premises i.e., R. Ali Grand Mall, Main Road, Ranchi (a copy of the 2025:JHHC:20042 2 settlement/agreement dated 10.02.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the present interlocutory application). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 6 and 7 accepts that an agreement dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure-3 to the present interlocutory application) has been entered between the parties. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, particularly the petitioner and the respondent nos. 6 & 7 as well as for the reasons stated in the present interlocutory application, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 5. The present interlocutory application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No. 124 of 2022 6. In view of the order passed in I.A. No. 3054 of 2025, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 7. Interim order dated 31.01.2024 stands vacated. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish