Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30332 (RAJ)

PRADEEP URF CHUTTAN S/O SHRI RAJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11919/2025 · 2025-09-19

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38680] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11919/2025 Pradeep Urf Chuttan S/o Shri Rajendra, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chohti Bazar Pando Ka Mohalla Kasba Niwai District Tonk Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Veer Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 19/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 348/2025 registered at Police Station Niwai, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovered quantity of contraband articles i.e. smack is 6.57gram, which is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:38680] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11919/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that recovered quantity of contraband articles i.e. smack is 6.57 gram, which is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this court deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pradeep Urf Chuttan S/o Shri Rajendra, in connection with FIR No. 348/2025 registered at Police Station Niwai, District Tonk shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /141