IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2328 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Sh. Ranjeet Singh and Others ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. He states that respondents after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.2500 of 2021, titled as Ranjit Singh and Others Vs. State of H.P. and Others, have rejected the representation filed by the petitioner on the ground that petitioner is not similar situate to Ranjit Singh (supra), which fact has been fairly acknowledged by learned counsel representing the petitioner. 2. Since there was only direction to respondents to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner and respondents after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of Ranjit Singh (supra) have rejected the same, nothing remains to be 2 adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of, however, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed. November 19, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge