1 2025:CGHC:32769 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6716 of 2025 1 - Smt. Nita Jain W/o Late Pritosh Jain Aged About 45 Years Working As Teacher, And Posted At Govt. Middle School Patelpara, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Director, Education Division Bastar District Bastar Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramcharan Sahu, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 14-07-2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming following relief(s):- (i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Respondent no.4 in respect of the case of the petitioner or to issue direction to take extension Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 of time for her posting at original place for one month for her treatment and operation of her elbow, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a mandamus directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and to permit the petitioner to continue in the present place of posting, in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his submission to the extent that the petitioner’s attachment was revoked vide order dated 16-06-2025 (Annexure-P/1) and she moved her representation for continuation on her attached place of posting as she is suffering from ailment and having family difficulties, which is still pending before respondent No.3 and the same may be considered sympathetically by respondent No.3 within a stipulated time frame and a direction may be issued to them for the same. 3. Learned counsel for the State though opposes the submission on merits, however, he submits that he has no objection if any direction is issued to respondent No.3 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 17-06-2025 in accordance with law. 4. Considering the limited submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the representation dated 17-06-2025 made before the respondent No.3, it would be appropriate to direct respondent No.3 to take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioner as early as possible. 5. Therefore, respondent No.3 is directed to take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioner dated 17-06-2025 (Annexure-P/5) on its own merits in accordance wit law within a period of four weeks from the receipt of copy of this order. 3 6. The petitioner is directed to produce copy of this order before respondent No.3 within a week from today. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Aadil Judge