Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30324 (KAR)

SMT. SHANTHA KUMARI v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY COMPANY LTD

WP/20586/2021 · 2025-01-24

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3246 WP No. 20586 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 20586 OF 2021 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SMT. SHANTHA KUMARI W/O LATE SRI. B.A. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT 62/6, NEAR KABBALAMMA TEMPLE, BHARATH NAGAR, 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE-563115. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA BHAT M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY COMPANY LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., K-4 SUB DIVISION, BESCOM. BANGALORE-560092. 3. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (ELE) BESCOM VIGILANCE RAJAJINAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY-560079. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM VIGILANCE, RAJAJINAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY-560079. 5. SRI V. RAVI MOHITHE, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3246 WP No. 20586 of 2021 BESCOM VIGILANCE, RAJAJI NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY-560079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.V.GIRIJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 (PH)) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER BEARING NO.AEE/VIG/RAJ.PS.CR.NO/179/2021 DATED 13.08.2021 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, A COPY OF THE SAME IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C AS THE SAME IS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, IRRATIONAL AND IN TOTAL DISREGARD TO THE PROCEDURE SPECIFIED UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF SUPPLY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER In the petition, the petitioner is assailing the notice dated 13.08.2021. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 5 would submit that the petition is not maintainable as further action has taken place pursuant to the notice dated 13.08.2021 in terms of the order dated 23.08.2021. The said order is marked at Annexure 'R8'. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3246 WP No. 20586 of 2021 3. On perusal of the said order, it would indicate that Case No.¨ÉeÁzÀ/gÁ¥ÉÆoÁ/¹Dgï.£ÀA/179/2021 referred to in notice at Annexure 'C' dated 13.08.2021 is adjudicated. 4. Admittedly, Annexure 'R8' is not questioned before this Court. Accordingly, the petition is not maintainable. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to question the order at Annexure 'R8' in the manner known to law subject to the law of limitation. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48