Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3032 (RAJ)

RAM PRASAD GHOGALIYA FATHER/O SHRI GULAB CHAND GHOGALIYA v. MR. RAJESH KUMAR YADAV

CCP/40/2025 · 2025-08-21

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33028] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 40/2025 Ram Prasad Ghogaliya Father/o Shri Gulab Chand Ghogaliya, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Ringus, Tehsil Shri Madhopur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav, I.a.s. Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Gov- ernment Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Mr. Sandeep Choudhary, Director, Local Self Bodies, Gov- ernment Of Rajasthan, Resiency Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. Mr. Pawan Kumar Meena, Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Ringus, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Gov- ernment Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG, with Mr. Manoj Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/08/2025 Vide order dated 06.02.2024, the petitioner was to file a rep- resentation to the respondents and same was to be decided by the respondents in accordance with law. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the re- spondents submits that the representation of the petitioner has been decided and vide letter dated 18.03.2025 and the petitioner has also been informed by about the decision. He further submits [2025:RJ-JP:33028] (2 of 2) [CCP-40/2025] that after consideration of the representation, the petitioner was not found to be selected in the lottery. Letter dated 18.03.2025 placed before this Court by the AAG is taken on record. In view of the letter dated 18.03.2025, no further cause of action survives to continue this contempt petition. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate rem- edy if he has any grievance as regards the decision of the respon- dents. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /24