Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30311 (KAR)

ABDUL REHMAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/9621/2022 · 2025-02-21

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7941 CRL.P No. 9621 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9621 OF 2022 BETWEEN: ABDUL REHMAN S/O UTTABBA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A MALNAD AGENCY, MAHADEV PET, MADKERI KODAGU, KARNATAKA - 571 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED UMMER, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY WOMEN POLICE STATION DEVARAJA SUB DIVISION MYSORE CITY-570001 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR STATE PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BANGALORE 2. SMT ARBIN SEHER W/O FIROZ REHMAN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO.19, RAJPUT BLOCK, N.R. MOHALLA, MYSORE KARNATAKA - 570 007 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VENKAT SATHYANARAYAN, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.2 IN C.C.NO.28/2021 OF WOMEN P.S., DEVERAJ SUB DIVISION, MYSORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498(A), 417, 420, 506, 323 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7941 CRL.P No. 9621 of 2022 OF D.P ACT PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF VII ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND J.M.F.C AT MYSORE. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over and again called at 3.20 p.m. 2. The order sheet dated 09.01.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation. The petition is of the year 2022. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter after four weeks. Interim order granted earlier is extended until the next date of hearing." 3. Inspite of that there is no progress in the matter. Required process fee with correct address for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is not furnished even when the matter is listed for the fourth time. It appears that the petitioner is not - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7941 CRL.P No. 9621 of 2022 interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petitioner is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2