Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3031 (UTT)

SUSHANT KUMAR THAKUR v. AMRITA

AO/71/2024 · 2025-03-28

Alok Mahra, Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS A.O. No. 71 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Sadaf Gaur along with Ms. Asmi, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. In the instant appeal, the Coordinate Bench, vide order dated 06.08.2024, directed deposit of ₹30,000/- towards litigation expenses, subject to which notices were issued to the respondents. On 06.03.2025, this Court granted two weeks’ further time and directed that in case of default, the appeal would stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court. 3. The Registrar (Judicial), relying on the Section Officer (Cash Section) report dated 28.03.2025, to the effect that no amount had been deposited in compliance of the Court’s order, consigned the record. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant had, in fact, deposited the amount on 20.03.2025 in the respondent’s account, and the transaction details of such deposit are annexed with the restoration application. 5. Issue notice to the respondent on delay condonation application as well as restoration application. 6. Steps to be taken within two weeks. 7. List this case on 13.10.2025. (Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.) 25.08.2025 25.08.2025 Mamta