2025:CGHC:31894 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6865 of 2025 Bhagwati Kashyap W/o Soman Ram Kashyap Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Teacher At Government Upper Primary School, Nainpur, Block- Tokapal, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh. Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Joint Director Division Education, Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer D.E.O. Office, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block- Tokapal, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee, Tehsil- Tokapal, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Smita Jha, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10.07.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not joined at his/her transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.11 17:20:28 +0530 Wps 6865 of 2025 2 published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, he/she will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner has already submitted her representation before the concerned authorities to redress his/her grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner has already submitted representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee, the Committee will take a decision on his/her representation in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee shall decide the representation dated 13.06.2025, submitted by the petitioner within a period of five days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. Petitioner is directed to produce copy of this order before the Committee concerned within three days from the date of receipt of copy of this order 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma