[2025:RJ-JP:37935] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11688/2025 Bablu S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Riyabadi Police Station Padukala District Nagaur (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Bablu S/o Shri Omprakash seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.137/2025 dated 31.08.2025 registered at P.S. Sindhi Camp District – Jaipur West, for the offence under Sections 303(2) and 112(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. [2025:RJ-JP:37935] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11688/2025] 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that for incident of 01.08.2025 complainant has lodged a report on 31.08.2025. He further submitted that a report is registered against unnamed and unknown persons. He also submitted that on the basis of CCTV footage near bus stand, present petitioner is detained only on ground of suspicion. He further submitted that after making a recovery of currency of ₹1,000/- present petitioner is arrayed as an accused. He further submitted that after detention of present petitioner, no test identification parade (TIP) was conducted by police and present petitioner is named as an accused. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On the basis of report dated 31.08.2025 lodged by complainant Jafrudin about incident of theft of ₹1.5 lacs on platform No.5 Sindhi Camp, Jaipur on 01.08.2025, a case is registered and investigated. After searching CCTV footage police has suspected involvement of present petitioner and others and on detention and interrogation, present petitioner is arrested and ₹1,000/- is recovered at the instance of petitioner. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:37935] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11688/2025] 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Bablu S/o Shri Omprakash, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /223