Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30282 (MAD)

C.VASU v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR

WP/7036/2025 · 2025-03-04

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 C.Vasu S/o.Late.Chinnathambi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Registrar, Salem, Salem District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Tharamangalam, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Salem, Salem District. 4. The Executive Officer, Kailasanathar Thirukoil, Tharamangalam, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent in refusal check slip No.RFL/Tharamangalam/7/2025 dated 14.02.2025, 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to register the sale agreement dated 14.02.2025 presented by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Elango For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath, Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader [R3 & R4] ***** O R D E R This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip issued by the second respondent dated 14.02.2025 and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to register the sale agreement dated 14.02.2025 presented for registration by the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr.M.Elango, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 3 and 4. 3. The refusal check slip has been issued by the second respondent mainly on the ground that the petitioner will have to get a No 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 Objection Certificate from the temple which claims ownership over the property. 4. In the considered view of this Court, in order to deal with cases of this nature, directions were issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Sudha Ravi Kumar v. The Special Commissioner [2017 (3) CTC 135]. Paragraph No.25 deals with the guidelines that were given to registering authority to conduct a summary enquiry and take a decision. 5. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the respondent to conduct a summary enquiry, issue notice to the petitioner and to the fourth respondent as per the guidelines issued by the Division Bench and take a decision to either register the document or in case, it is refused, to issue refusal check slip by assigning proper reasons within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 In the result, this writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 04.03.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm To 1. The District Registrar, Salem, Salem District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Tharamangalam, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Salem, Salem District. 4. The Executive Officer, Kailasanathar Thirukoil, Tharamangalam, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. Writ Petition No.7036 of 2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis