Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30282 (CHH)

VRINDAVAN SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2053/2025 · 2025-07-02

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30078 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2053 of 2025 Vrindavan Sahu S/o Late Sugreev Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sub Divisional Magistrate, Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Savitri Sahu W/o Late Ishwar Sahu Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Bondanwapali Phn - 12, Banigirola, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Madhuban Sahu S/o Late Shri Sugreev Sahu Aged About 44 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Kunjban Sahu S/o Late Shri Sugreev Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 5 - Brijmohan Sahu S/o Late Shri Sugreev Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 6 - Dropati W/o Vrindavan Aged About 40 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2025.07.10 17:52:29 +0530 2 7 - Jayanti W/o Madhuban Aged About 42 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 8 - Toshkumar S/o Vrindavan Aged About 25 Years R/o Bondanwapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 03/07/2025 1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sariapali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of above submission, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. The Registry is directed to return certified copy after obtaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Shubham