- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24404 WP No. 19653 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19653 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SRI ABHISHEK G S S/O SUBBEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT GOWDAHALLI VILLAGE, HORATTI GOWDAHALLI PANCHAYAT, GONIBEEDU HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. MAHESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANIKANTA H.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24404 WP No. 19653 of 2025 (1) ISSUE A WRIT OR SUCH OTHER ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE THE REPORT DATED 05/02/2025 BEARING NO. NO.BA.HU (GONIBIDU) C.R/332/1991-92 BY 3RD RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E; (2) ISSUE A WRIT OR SUCH OTHER ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE THE REPORT DATED 06/06/2025 BEARING NO. NO.BA.HU(GOO)C.R/332/1991-92 BY 3RD RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G; (3) ISSUE A WRIT OR SUCH OTHER ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS INITATED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER RULE 108K OF KLR RULES, 1966 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F; THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the notice dated 25.04.2025 (Annexure ‘F’) issued by respondent No.2. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24404 WP No. 19653 of 2025 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate wherein respondent No.2 has issued notice under Rule 108K of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. In that view of the matter without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is open for the petitioner herein to approach respondent No.2 and to continue the proceedings before the said authority. It is also open for the petitioner herein to urge all available grounds in law including the aspect of limitation herein. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition is rejected. Accordingly, pending I.As., stand disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE JT/-/ CT:SM