IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.104 of 2025 ------ Pinki Devi, aged about-40 years, wife of Santosh Nayak, Resident of Village- House No.-NH-23 Nayak Tola, P.O. Chatarmandu, P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Government of Jharkhand at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. The Director General of Police Headquarter Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, North Chotanagpur, Parmandal, At, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. 5. The Deputy Commissioner at Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh 6. The District Supply Officer at Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 7. The Superintendent of Police at Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 8. The Sub-division Police Officer at Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 9. The Officer-in-charge at Ramgarh Police Station, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. 10. The Executive Magistrate cum Block Supply Officer at Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh. .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC (MINES) III ------ Order No.02 Dated- 11-02-2025 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submit that since there is no merit in this W.P. (Cr.), hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this W.P. (Cr.). Accordingly, this W.P. (Cr.) is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/