Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30273 (KAR)

SRI JAY RAMANI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9266/2022 · 2025-04-08

Mohammad Nawaz

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14964 CRL.P No. 9266 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9266 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. JAY RAMANI, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O SHAKARLAL SHANTHILAL, NO. 26-1-1920, EMEBRAID BLOCK PARKSTONE ENCLAVE, SURVIES NO. 358 AND 492, GUMMADIVARICHENE, KONDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.G. KAMATH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. D.C. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE (SRI. K.G. KAMATH RETIRED FROM THIS CASE)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY UPPARE POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. S.M. KRISHNAPPA, S/O MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS NO. 2175, 17TH A MAIN ROAD 5TH C ROSS, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANGAR, BENGALURU - 560 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE AND SMT. VAISHNAVI S.S, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14964 CRL.P No. 9266 of 2022 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST PETITIONER REGISTERED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT UPPARPET POLICE, BANGALORE IN CR.NO.95/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 415, 420 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE V ACMM, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel Sri. Govindaraya Kamath.K has filed memo for retirement, wherein it is stated that the counsel has executed 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) on 26.08.2023 to the petitioner for engaging another counsel. 2. Acknowledgment for having issued the notice to the petitioner is also enclosed along with the memo. However, the notice has been returned with acknowledgment indicating that there is no such person in the address. 3. It appears that petitioner is not at all interested in prosecuting the petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14964 CRL.P No. 9266 of 2022 4. Memo for retirement filed by learned counsel is accepted. Since, there is no alternative arrangement made by the petitioner, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 are disposed of. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT: BHK