Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30273 (AP)

GUJJAR NAGESWARA RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20981/2019 · 2025-09-17

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010436532019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20981/2019 Between: 1. GUJJAR NAGESWARA RAO, N ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DHONE TOWN POLICE STATION, DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCS POLICE STATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SAMUDRALA BALAJI, S/O RAMANJANEYULU, R/O PATHAPETA, DHONE TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or any 2 other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in threatening the petitioner to settle the civil dispute between him and the 5th respondent as illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent, by calling him to the police station, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20981 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, as the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 18.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20981 of 2019 Date: 18.09.2025 PSA