SAJAD AHMED AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DODA AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/341/2025 · 2025-04-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3027 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3027 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CRM(M) No. 341/2025
Sajjad Ahmed and Anr. …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sagir Ahmed Khan, Advocate vice Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (21.04.2025)
01.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there is discrepancy in some documents and, accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. His statement is taken on record.
02.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
21.04.2025
Ram Krishan
S. No. 245 Ram Krishan 2025.04.21 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu