Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30268 (MAD)

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU v. R.JOSEPH NAVEEN KUMAR

WA/792/2023 · 2025-03-17

A D Maria Clete, R Suresh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.No.792 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.A.No.792 of 2023 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Education Department, St. Fort George Chennai – 09. 2. The Director of School Education D.P.I. Buildings, College Road Chennai. 3. The Chief Educational Officer Thiruvannamalai. 4. The District Educational Officer Thiruvannamalai. .. Appellants Vs. 1. R. Joseph Naveen Kumar 2. The Correspondent Danish Mission Higher Secondary School Thiruvannamalai – 606 601. .. Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P.No.15641 of 2020 dated 15.12.2021. For the Appellants : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Additional Government Pleader For the Respondents : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.792 of 2023 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was authored by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This intra-Court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Writ Court dated 15.12.2021 made in W.P.No.15641 of 2020. In fact, the Writ Court passed a common order, disposing several writ petitions, including W.P.No.15641 of 2020. 2. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Junior Assistant in a private aided recognized School with effect from 22.11.2017. The appointment was not been approved, therefore, the writ petitioner had filed the said writ petition, which was disposed along with a batch of writ petitions. 3. Though this appeal has been directed against the order of the Writ Court dated 15.12.2021, allowing the batch of writ petitions, today, when the present writ appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr.J.C.Durairaj, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would submit that the appellants, during the pendency of this appeal, decided to implement the order passed by the Writ Court which is impugned herein and accordingly, proceedings to that effect has been issued by the Chief Education Officer, Thiruvannamalai, vide proceedings dated 19.08.2023, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.792 of 2023 whereby, the following orders have been passed:- “ghh;it (9) ,y; fhZk; brd;id cau;ePjpkd;w tHf;fpd; jPu;g;ghizapid bray;gLj;Jk; bghUl;L. jpUtz;zhkiy. nldp!; kp!d; muR epjpa[jtp bgWk; nky;epiyg; gs;spapy; ,sepiy cjtpahsuhfg; gzpg[upe;j jpU/gp/vy;/rhKnty; b$af;Fkhu; vd;ghu; 31/01/2017 gpw;gfy; Xa;t[ bgw;wjhy; Vw;gl;l fhypg;gzpaplj;jpy;. 22/11/2017 Kw;gfy; Kjy; jpU/Mu;/n$hrg; etpd;Fkhh; vd;ghu; ,sepiy cjtpahsuhf ,g;gs;spapd; jhshsuhy; epakdk; bra;ag;gl;likf;F xg;g[jy; tH';fg;gLfpwJ/ ,e;epiyapy; jpUtz;zhkiy. nldp!; kp!d; muR epjpa[jtp bgWk; nky;epiyg;gs;spapd; 01/08/2022 epytug;goahd khztu;fs; vz;zpf;if mog;gilapyhd gzpahsu; epu;za mwpf;ifapd;go 2 ,sepiy cjtpahsu; gzpapl';fspy; 1 kl;Lnk jFjpahdjhft[k; 1 ,sepiy cjtpahsu; gzpaplk; egUld; cgup vd fz;lwpag;gl;L epu;zak; bra;ag;gl;Ls;sikahy;. ,g;gzpahsiu j';fs; nkyhz;ikapd; fPH; ,a';Fk; gs;spfspy; fhypahf cs;s ,sepiy cjtpahsu; gzpaplj;jpy; gzpeputy; bra;J mjd; mwpf;ifia cld; ,t;tYtyfj;jpw;F gs;spj; jhshsu; mDg;gp itf;f ntz;Lk; vd;w epge;jidapd; mog;gilapYk; ,t;nthg;g[jy; tH';fg;gLfpwJ/ nkYk; ,t;bthg;g[jy; ghu;it (13) ,y; fhZk; brd;id cau;ePjpkd;w nky;KiwaPl;L tHf;fpy; bgwg;gLk; ,Wjpj; jPu;g;gpw;F cl;gl;lJ vd jhshsUf;Fj; bjuptpf;fg;gLfpwJ/” 4. This position is not controverted by the learned counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.792 of 2023 appearing for the first respondent/writ petitioner, who would submit that pursuant to the said order, the first respondent/writ petitioner's appointment has been approved and he has received the salary arrears also. 5. In view of the said developments, where the order which is impugned herein itself having been accepted and complied with by the appellant Department, no further adjudication is required in this appeal. Recording the same, the present appeal stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.7633 of 2023 is closed. (R.S.K., J.) (A.D.M.C., J) 17.03.2025 Neutral Citation:Yes/No drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.792 of 2023 To: 1. The Secretary to Government The State of Tamil Nadu Education Department, St. Fort George Chennai – 09. 2. The Director of School Education D.P.I. Buildings, College Road Chennai. 3. The Chief Educational Officer Thiruvannamalai. 4. The District Educational Officer Thiruvannamalai. Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.792 of 2023 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. AND A.D.MARIA CLETE , J. (drm) W.A.No.792 of 2023 17.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis