Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128283
Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23481 of 2023 Applicant :- Babban @ Satish Dohre Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for applicant, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.22 of 2023, under Sections 394, 411 and 302 I.P.C., Police Station Indargarh, District Kannauj with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
4. As per prosecution story, the applicant was arrested at the spot involved in robbery on 17.01.2023 at about 3:00 p.m.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. The said arrest has been made just to show good work by the police. The criminal history of fourteen cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is in jail since 18.01.2023 and is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
6. Per contra, learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that the applicant was arrested at the spot and Rs.50,000/- were recovered from his possession. The criminal history of fourteen cases assigned to the applicant has not been properly explained as no orders have been annexed.
7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into
consideration the fact that the applicant was apprehended at the
scene with Rs. 50,000 and the criminal history assigned to the applicant has not been properly explained by the counsel for the applicant, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.
8. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected.
9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the
facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial.
Order Date :- 31.7.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad