"‘APHCOI 0434372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22738 OF 2025 Between: Mopuri Vijaya Kumari, W/o. Gunda Doraswamy, Aged about 51 years, Occ; Housewife, R/o. Mavillavari Palli, Devalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, Office at Mangalagiri, Guntur District 3. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District at Rayachoti. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madnapalli, Annamayya District. 5. Inspector of Police, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 6. Narsimhulu, Sub-Inspector, Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 7. Nagaraju, Constable, Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 8. B Suresh Reddy, S/o. Bujjana, Age Not known, R/o. Mavillavari Palli, Devalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. i R/0. 9. B Pedda Reddapa Reddy, S/o. Bujjana, Age Not known Mavillavari Palli, Devalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. 10.B Raghunath Reddy, S/o. Bujjana, Age Not known, R/o. Mavillavari Palli, Devalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. 11.B Mahendra Reddy, S/o. B. Pedda Reddapa Reddy, Age Not known, R/o. Mavillavari Palli, Devalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not the petitioners complaints Dt. 11.06.2025 and registering the F.I.R on 13.08.2025 though it is a cognizable offence, is nothing but illegal, arbitrary. highhanded and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and consequently direct the Respondents, to take action by registering the F.I.R on the petitioners complaint Dt. 11.06.2025 and 13.08.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praymg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, to take action by registering the F.I.R, on the petitioner’s complaints Dt. 11.06.2025 and 13.08.2025, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 : SRI V. FAROOQ, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 to 11 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: 5 APHC010434372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22738/2025 Between: 1.MOPURI VIJAYA KUMARI,, W/0. GUNDA DORASWAMY ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MAVILLAVARI PALLI, DEVALACHERUVU VILLAGE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. AGED MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, OFFICE AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTI. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADNAPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MULAKALACHERUVU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 6. NARSIMHULU, , SUB-INSPECTOR, MULAKALACHERUVU POLICE STATION, MULAKALACHERUVU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 7. NAGARAJU, CONSTABLE, STATION, MULAKALACHERUVU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. MULAKALACHERUVU POLICE 2 8. B SURESH REDDY, S/0. BUJJANA, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/0. PALLI, DEVALACHERUVU VILLAGE, MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 9. B PEDDA REDDAPA REDDY, S/O. BUJJANA, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/0. MAVILLAVARI PALLI, DEVALACHERUVU VILLAGE, MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 10.B RAGHUNATH REDDY, S/O. BUJJANA, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/0. MAVILLAVARI PALLI, DEVALACHERUVU VILLAGE, MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 11.B MAHENDRA REDDY, S/O. B. PEDDA REDDAPA REDDY, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/0. MAVILLAVARI PALLI, DEVALACHERUVU VILLAGE, MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. MAVILLAVARI ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 ^ THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22738 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “...pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the F.I.R on the petitioners complaints Dt. 11.06.2025 and 13.08.2025 though it is a cognizable offence, is nothing but illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of India and consequently direct the Respondents, to take action by registering the F.I.R on the petitioners complaint Dt. 11.06.2025 and 13.08.2025 and pass....’’ 2. Heard Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the subject matter is of civil in nature. Therefore, police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial J respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the 3. same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout her remedies before the appropriate forum. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, Office at Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District at Rayachoti. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madnapalli, Annamayya District. 5. Inspector of Police, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 6. Narsimhulu, Sub-Inspector, Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 7. Nagaraju, Constable, Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Mulakalacheruvu, Annamayya District. 8. One CC to Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CD Copies Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:01/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 22738 OF 2025 5( 1 1 SEP 2025 )S S«ctioa^*5>' DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS