Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30265 (AP)

I V SEETHADEVI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/22733/2025 · 2025-09-22

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010434562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 22733/2025 BETWEEN: 1. I V SEETHADEVI, W/O. LATE I.V.P. RAMA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 603, SRINIKETHAN AKSHAYA APARTMENT, PLOT NO. 843 AND 844, AYYAPPA SOCIETY, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BOBBIN MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction, one or more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents particularly Respondent No. 3 herein in not mutating the name of the petitioner in Form 1-B and Fasli Adangal in relation to the subject property i.e., land situated in an extent of Ac. 6.36 cents in Sy. No. 17/2 of Gorlisitharampuram Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram, though petitioner's predecessors names were entered in pre-abolition record is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and principles of Natural Justice and consequently, direct the Respondent No.3 to mutate the name of the petitioner in revenue records in respect of the land situated in an 2 extent of Ac. 6.36 cents in Sy. No. 17/2 of Gorlisitharampuram Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUGULU SREETEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter to the Registry on 19.09.2025, to enable the petitioner to withdraw the Writ petition. Accordingly, the matter is listed under the caption “For withdrawal”. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 23.09.2025 Harin 4 74 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 22733 OF 2025 Date: 23-09-2025 Harin