- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21953 CRL.RP No. 1341 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1341 OF 2016 BETWEEN: M PARAMESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE MARIAPPA OPP:JAI MARUTHI TALKIES MAGADI MAIN ROAD SUNKADAKATT, BANGALORE – 560 091. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAVEEN C, ADVOCATE) AND: HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT LAKKANAHALLY HULLIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B KUMARA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.02.2012 IN C.C.No.301/2006 BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA AND IN CRL.A.No.51/2012 DATED 17.10.2015 BY THE VI ADDL. S.J., TUMAKURU AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21953 CRL.RP No. 1341 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent absent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present and submits that the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the respondent. He further submits that petitioner has paid the settlement amount to the respondent. This Court on 11.02.2025 has passed the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo before this Court along with the order sheet of the trial Court, wherein memo is filed by the learned counsel for the complainant and the same is signed by the complainant, stating that the above case may kindly be dismissed as not pressed as the complainant has received the entire cheque amount from the accused. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made the payment to the respondent and to that effect, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21953 CRL.RP No. 1341 of 2016 memo is filed and hence the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the entire amount, which he has deposited before the trial Court. Hence, I.A.No.1/2025 is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount in view of withdrawal of the case by the complainant. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is settled, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43