[2025:RJ-JP:16308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11425/2024 Khurshid S/o Badlu, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Jalalpur, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/04/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.0215/2024 registered at Police Station-Sikari, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 447 and 379 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor & counsel for complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as complainant submits that both the parties have arrived at compromise. The matter pertains to Sections 447 and 379 of IPC. The petitioner is local resident and there is no reason to evade the investigation, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:16308] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11425/2024] 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Khurshid S/o Badlu, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/38