Pushpendra Diholiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
WPL/19/2015 · 2025-01-27
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30254 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30254 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
2025:CGHC:4758
NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 19 of 2015 Pushpendra Diholiya S/o D.K. Diholiya Aged About 25 Years President Chhattisgarh Ekta Shramik, B/2, Basant Corner, Avanti Vihar, Thana- Telibanadha, Raipur, C.G., Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner Versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Labour Development Naya Raipur Mantralaya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2- Dy. Labour Commissioner Endravati Bhawan, 2 Nd Floor Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3- Bharat Aluminium Com. Ltd. Through- Manager Balco Nagar, Korba, C.G., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondent No. 1 &2/State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Ambast, Advocate For Intervenor : Mr. Sudeep Johri with Ishaddil Ali, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 27.01.2025 1) Mr. Prateek Singh, Advocate would submit that there was instruction from the Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE
-2- petitioner to appear in this matter, but till date his Office has not received any power and thus, he pleads no instruction in this matter. 2) On the other hand, Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate would submit that the instant petition has been filed by the President, Chhattisgarh Ekta Shramik Sangh and the Sangh (union) has already been deregistered vide
order dated 29.09.2021. 3) Taking into consideration the above stated fact(s), the petition is dismissed. However, the workmen would be at liberty to take recourse to law, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim