Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30253 (PNJ)

VARSHA KAKKAR v. SHRI AJOY SHARMA IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/837/2024 · 2025-07-28

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT VARSHA KAKKAR SHRI AJOY SHARMA IAS AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Dhivya Jearth, Advocate (through video conferencing). Mr. Athar Ahmed, D Mr. Vivek Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARKESH MANUJA Both their dispute in the following terms: sewerage pipelines of all three floors shall be repaired in a manner that they are separated from each other and the owner of the each floor shall manage their own sewerage connection. The plumber propo namely Dinesh Kumar alongwith his associates shall undertake the work of separating the pipelines of all three floors i.e. Ground floor, first second floor. Further it is submitted that the expenses for blocking the pipes coming from the first floor and second floor shall be borne by the petitioner namely Varsha Kakkar and the expenses of installing the sewerage pipes on the first floor and sewerage system of municipal co petitioner's sewerage system) shall be borne by the owners of the first floor and second floor respectively). The sewage pipe shall be repaired by Dinesh Kumar plumber as per the report submitted by him. Dinesh Kum proposed by the petitioner shall assure the smooth functioning of the sewage pipe line of all the three floors. The petitioner as well as the municipal council official shall corporate to complete the repair work by minimum damage to the old co span of one month. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RSHA KAKKAR Versus SHRI AJOY SHARMA IAS AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Dhivya Jearth, Advocate for the (through video conferencing). Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vivek Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) oth the parties are ad idem that the parties have settled their dispute in the following terms:- “As per the settlement arrived between the parties the sewerage pipelines of all three floors shall be repaired in a manner that they are separated from each other and the owner of the each floor shall manage their own sewerage connection. The plumber propo namely Dinesh Kumar alongwith his associates shall undertake the work of separating the pipelines of all three floors i.e. Ground floor, first second floor. Further it is submitted that the expenses for blocking the pipes oming from the first floor and second floor shall be borne by the petitioner namely Varsha Kakkar and the expenses of installing the sewerage pipes on the first floor and second floor which shall be directly connected to the sewerage system of municipal corporation (without being connected to the petitioner's sewerage system) shall be borne by the owners of the first floor and second floor respectively). The sewage pipe shall be repaired by Dinesh Kumar plumber as per the report submitted by him. Dinesh Kum proposed by the petitioner shall assure the smooth functioning of the sewage pipe line of all the three floors. The petitioner as well as the municipal council official shall corporate to complete the repair work by minimum damage to the old construction in the building. The work shall be completed within a span of one month.” IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-837-2024 Date of Decision: July 28, 2025 ........Petitioner SHRI AJOY SHARMA IAS AND ANOTHER ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner AG, Punjab. Mr. Vivek Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2. the parties are ad idem that the parties have settled As per the settlement arrived between the parties the sewerage pipelines of all three floors shall be repaired in a manner that they are separated from each other and the owner of the each floor shall manage their own sewerage connection. The plumber proposed by the petitioner namely Dinesh Kumar alongwith his associates shall undertake the work of separating the pipelines of all three floors i.e. Ground floor, first floor, and second floor. Further it is submitted that the expenses for blocking the pipes oming from the first floor and second floor shall be borne by the petitioner namely Varsha Kakkar and the expenses of installing the sewerage pipes on second floor which shall be directly connected to the rporation (without being connected to the petitioner's sewerage system) shall be borne by the owners of the first floor and second floor respectively). The sewage pipe shall be repaired by Dinesh Kumar plumber as per the report submitted by him. Dinesh Kumar, plumber proposed by the petitioner shall assure the smooth functioning of the sewage pipe line of all the three floors. The petitioner as well as the municipal council official shall corporate to complete the repair work by minimum damage to nstruction in the building. The work shall be completed within a 2024 , 2025 the parties are ad idem that the parties have settled As per the settlement arrived between the parties the sewerage pipelines of all three floors shall be repaired in a manner that they are separated from each other and the owner of the each floor shall manage sed by the petitioner namely Dinesh Kumar alongwith his associates shall undertake the work of floor, and second floor. Further it is submitted that the expenses for blocking the pipes oming from the first floor and second floor shall be borne by the petitioner namely Varsha Kakkar and the expenses of installing the sewerage pipes on second floor which shall be directly connected to the rporation (without being connected to the petitioner's sewerage system) shall be borne by the owners of the first floor and second floor respectively). The sewage pipe shall be repaired by Dinesh ar, plumber proposed by the petitioner shall assure the smooth functioning of the sewage pipe line of all the three floors. The petitioner as well as the municipal council official shall corporate to complete the repair work by minimum damage to nstruction in the building. The work shall be completed within a TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.07.29 04:15 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-837-2024 -2- In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. 28.07.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.07.29 04:15 I agree to specified portions of this document