APHC010010562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 954/2025 Between: 1. Y SREERAMULU, S/O Y VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-45, DOMANNA BAVI, THETTI VILLAGE, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU, MANGALGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CUM THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE RURAL POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MOLAKALACHERUVU POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. KARRE SATYANANDAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Karre Satyanandam, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri M.Sreenu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader. 2. The contents of the FIR dated 08.04.2024 bearing FIR No.64/2024 (Ex.P6), would read as under: “Occurred on 08-04-2024 at 4.00 PM, at Gudupalli cross, Chowdasamudram, Kaluvapalli road, Molakalacheruvu mandal and reported in the P.S on the same day at 6.30 PM, in which the accused A-1 Kammala Ganesh Kumar @ Ganesh, A-2 Kammala Pratap A-3 Rajesh @ Raju were transported the illegal liquor pac3 cardboard boxes in their motor cycle bearing No AP 40 H 4184 containing packets and sold 15 card board boxes of liquor packets sold to A-4 Kadirendra babu and A-5 Nagendra and also sold 10 card boxes of liquor packets i.e., DK DOUBLE KICK FINE WHISKY-90 ml-1728 packets, DK DOUBLE KICK FINE WHISKY- 180ml-96packets along with TOYOTO vehicle bearing No.AP 36 AY 2322 and under a cover of Mahazarnama. The accused A-3 to A5 were absconded from the spot.” 3. Having regard to the above facts, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. Petitioner is at liberty to approach the authority. If the Petitioner makes any application, it is needless 3 to state that the authority shall consider the same within reasonable time and in accordance with law. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 20.01.2025 VTS