- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23353 CRL.RP No. 1174 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1174 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI M.G. HUCHHEGOWDA S/O LATE GOVINDEGOWDA R/AT C/O RAJAGOPLACHARI MASJID ROAD NEAR VETERINARY HOSPITAL HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD CHIKKABANAVARA BENGALURU - 560 090. AND ALSO AT:- MUPPADI GHATA VILLAGE KANDANUR POST, MADHURE HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. AND ALSO WORKING AT:- OFFICE OF THE OFFICIATING G.M (F) B.C, C.E.O, (B.C) UNIT HAL OLD AIRPORT ROAD BENGALURU - 560 017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI UMESH S, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI UMESHA C S/O SRI. CHANNATHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS C/O SHYMALA GOWDA R/AT No. 8, SUBHASNAGARA Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23353 CRL.RP No. 1174 of 2022 TARABANAHALLI HESARAGHTTA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 090. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI LOKESH S G, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND FINE IMPOSED BY THE XXXIV A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (A.C.M.M.-34) VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 01.10.2022 PASSED IN C.C.No.50356/2017 AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Learned counsel for the petitioner was also absent on 20.01.2024, 15.04.2024 and 24.04.2025. On 24.04.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. Learned counsel for respondent present and submits that interim order dated 14.06.2023 is not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23353 CRL.RP No. 1174 of 2022 complied with. If the condition precedent for suspension of sentence is not fulfilled, the trial Court is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner/accused in accordance with law. List this matter immediately after summer vacation 2025. If on the next date of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner fails to proceed with the matter, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.” 2. Even after the above order is passed, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present today for prosecuting the revision petition. It appears that the revision petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision petition. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22