Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30234 (BOM)

SUMITRA SUNITA JIVAN DESHMUKH v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

WP/12076/2017 · 2025-06-26

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

101-wp-12076-`7.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 101 WRIT PETITION NO. 12076 OF 2017 SUMITRA SUNITA JIVAN DESHMUKH VERSUS THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ... Mr. Khande Avinash A, Advocate for the Petitioner .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 26.06.2025 PER COURT :- . Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner submits that due to lapse of time, prayers in writ petition do not survive. 2. Hence, writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1