APHC010436052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 22671/2025 Between: 1. MADLA SIVA MANIKYALA RAO, S/O UMA MAHESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D.NO.4-7B, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA RURAL(M), VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (H B), VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISCTRICT. 5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH COMPREHENSIVE, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CFMS), 6TH FLOOR, C-BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V BADRA NAGA SESHAYYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri A.V. Badra Naga Seshayya, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development and Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Counsel representing Ms. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for the APCRDA. 2. Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Counsel representing Ms. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for the APCRDA has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Chief Engineer (H&B), APCRDA, Vijayawada, dated 02.09.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that an amount of Rs.2,08,807/- has been paid to the contractor. This fact is not disputed by the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. On the contrary, based on Instructions, he confirms that the Writ Petitioner has successfully received the said amount. Therefore, no further consideration is necessary. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.09.2025 DSV 198 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 22671/2025 03.09.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 22671/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 02. 03.09.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV