KURRA RAMAMOHANRAO v. KAKARLA VENKATA SIVARA KRISHNA
CRP/2301/2023 · 2025-07-02
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30229 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30229 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010434992023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2301/2023 Between:
1. KURRA RAMAMOHANRAO, S/O. LATE SAMBASIVARAO, HINDU, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O.YADAVURU VILLAGE, AMARATHULURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KURRA SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. LATE SAMBASIVARAO, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS R/O.YADAVURU VILLAGE, AMARATHULURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. KAKARLA VENKATA SIVARA KRISHNA, S/O.NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O.YADAVURU VILLAGE, AMARTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. KURRA VENKATA BENARJI, S/O.LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.YADAVURU VILLAGE, AMARTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KAKARLA RAJESWARI, W/O.NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YERS, R/O. YALLAVURU VILLAGE,
AMARTHALURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to call for the records by setting aside the order, dated 13-03-2023 passed in I.A. No. 539 of 2023 in ATC 6/2019 on the file of the Special Officer and A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge . Tenali and allow the above presented Civil Revision Petition in the interest of justice and may kindly be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in the ATC 6/2019 on the file of the Special Officer and A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956- cum¬Principal Junior Civil Judge . Tenali pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition in the interest of justice as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VIJAY BHASKAR KAKUNOOR B Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2301 of 2023 ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 17.10.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners. Again, it was listed on 01.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
Dt: 03.07.2025 sj
173 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
CRP No.2301 of 2023
Date 03.07.2025
sj