- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24614-DB WP No. 18993 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 18993 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI PAVAN KUMAR B S S/O SATYANARAYANA B V AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, WORKING AS SHERISTEDAR, RRT BRANCH TALUK OFFICE CHANNARAYAPATNA, HASSAN DISTRICT, R/AT OPP. TO HEMAVATHI OFFICE, KEMBALA ROAD, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573111. …PETITIONER (BY MS. AMRUTHA M., ADV. FOR SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER MYSURU DIVISION, MYSURU -570005. Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24614-DB WP No. 18993 of 2025 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN- 573201. 4. THE TAHSILDAR CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V SHIVA REDDY, AGA 1 TO 4) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18.06.2025 PASSED BY THE KSAT BENGALURU IN A.NO-2620/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard learned counsel Smt.Amrutha M., appearing for Sri.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA Sri.V.Shivareddy for respondents. 2. Learned AGA would submit that the petitioner is retained as Sheristedar in RRT Branch, Taluk Office, Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan District. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24614-DB WP No. 18993 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also files a memo dated 08.07.2025 enclosing O.M. dated 30.06.2025 issued by the Regional Commissioner, Mysuru Division, Mysuru wherein the petitioner is retained at Channarayapatna. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would also submit that in view of the O.M. dated 30.06.2025, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 5. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the memo is placed on record. 6. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25