IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATt- (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUAf^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N^'^^ WRIT PETITION NO: 6627 OF 2011^ 'n -W Of m o» Between: P.Appa Rao, S/o.(Late) Somulu, aged about 51 years, Driver (removed service) E.D.No.450179,Paderu Depot, r/o.MIG-1-397 P.M.Palem, from Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District-530041 ...petitionefT AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation(APSRTC), Rep. by its Depot Manager, Paderu Depot, Visakhapatnam District 2. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation(APSRTC), rep. by its Divisional Manager, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District 3. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation(APSRTC), rep. by its Regional Manager, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Labour Employment Training And Factories, (LAB.I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS^ Petition under Article 22^of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam in ID.No.109 of 2007 dated 12.10.2009 published in AP Gazettee in G.O.Rt.No.1561 Labour Employment Training and Factories (LAB.I) Department dated 30.12.2009 and to quash the same as arbitrary illegal, and the orders passed by the first respondent in ^ No.P1/118(i)/05-POR dated 15.2.2006 the orders of the 2nd No.Steno/19(7)/06/VSP(R) dated 10.6.2006 and the respondent in orders of the 3rd j,fespondent in No.PA/19(35)/06/RM.VSP dated 15.5.2007 and declare the petitioner is entitled to continue in service without any break with all continuity of service with all consequential benefits from the date of removal. that I ■*?- his Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. V. RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR LABOUR^ The Court made the following: ORDER ( APHC010434412011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6627/2011 Between: ...PETITIONER P.appa Rao.visakhapatnam District-530041 AND Apsrtc Rep By Its Depot Manager Paderu Depot 3 Others...RESPONDENT(S) and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P VRAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) 2. N SRIHARI ( SC FOR APSRTC ) 3.. The Court made the following: Order: - listed under the caption for dismissal, today On earlier occasion also, there is no Despite the matter being represented for the petitioner none representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition isis dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1, Advocate [OPUC] Tarlada (SC for APSRTC) Advocate 1. One CC to Sri P. V. Ramana 2. One CC to Sri Vinod Kumar [OPUC] 3. Two CC’s to GP for Labour, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi[Oyjl 4. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:22/01/2025 ORDER & 07 HAR 2005 x ^ . Ciunnt Seciioo ^45«»«kTCSSS!^ WP.No.6627 of 2011 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS