Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
CRL.A No. 1683 of 2021 NC: 2024:KHC:11003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1683 OF 2021 BETWEEN:
SRI RIJWAN M S/O MEHABOOB MIYAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.2 JEEVANPURA MOHALLA CHANNAPATTANA TALUK PIN - 562 160 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA P H, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SRI RAVI S/O SRI PUTTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O KEMPE GOWDANA DODDI JEGGENAHALLI DAKLE KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 109. …RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.A FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.07.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT, RAMANAGARA IN CASE C.C.NO.1210/2013; b) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
CRL.A No. 1683 of 2021 NC: 2024:KHC:11003
JUDGMENT
No representation for appellant.
No representation for appellant even in the afternoon session.
Vide order dated 21.02.2024 as a last chance the matter is posted today with a condition that if the learned counsel for appellant fails to address
arguments, necessary orders would be passed.
It appears appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, I.A.No.1/2021 is rejected. Consequently, appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31