APHC010435392014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTIC^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1154 OF 2014 ^ Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters dated 18-07-2014 in W.P. No. 169 of 2014 Between: Patent against the order on the file of the High Court..^ 1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Represented by its Managing Mumbai M Bhavan. 4 & 6 Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai Maharashtra - 400001 Di'mrrn'r^p Corporation Limited, Represented by its Managing Director Petroleum House, 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai 400020 Maharastra- 400 001, India In^an m '-™ited. Represented by its Managing Director ^ndian OH Bhavan, G-9, AH Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra(E), Mumbai 400 ...Petitioners AND Mr. Vithanala Yagnesh, S/o. Sri. Vithanala Venkata years, Occupation; Private Employee, Colony, Opp; Current Office, Andhra Pradesh- 530013. Rao, aged about 41 R/o. H. No. 50-27-9, TPT Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WAMP 2783 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment and order in W.P. No. 169/2014 in so far as it is against the appellants herein/respondents<^ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI B MAYUR REDDY ^ Counsel for the Respondent: SRI V HARISH KUMAR The Court made the following order: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-2 [3483] APHC01043S392014 WRIT APPEAL NO: 1154 of 2014 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai, Maharastra and others ...Appellants Vs. ...Respondent Mr. Vithanala Yagnesh, Visakhapatnam. ********** None Advocate for Appellants Sri V. Harish Kumar Advocate for Respondent CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 21st July 2025 PC: None for the appellants. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. B Mayur Reddy Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. V Harish Kumar Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2. 3. gsc HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ORDER WA NO. 1154 OF 2014 DISMISSING THE WA FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS