APHC010435792007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14544/2007 Between: 1. TAMANA VENKAYAMMA, AND 2 OTHERS, W/O.LATE PANDURANGA RAO, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.MEDEPALLI ROAD, INDIRA COLONY, JALIPUDI POST, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, ELURU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. TAMMANA NAGARAJU,, S/O.LATE PANDURANGA RAO, UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. MADEPALLI ROAD, INDIRA COLONY, JALIPUDI POST, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, ELOURU RURAL MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 3. NADIKONDA MARY KUMARI,, W/O.MURALIKRISHNA, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SANTHAGUDIPADU, RAMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOVT OF A P LABOUR DEPT AND 2 OTHERS, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIT, HYD. 2. A P S E B REP BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD GROUNDS, BUNDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, APCPDCL., 3. APSEB REP BYITS DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, OPERATION, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, APCPDCL., ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the award dt. 26.8.2002 passed in I.D.No.266/1996 passed by the labour Court, Guntur and the consequential G.O.Rt.No.2081 dt. 20.9.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same and direct the Labour Court to permit the petitioner to lead the evidence, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 18265 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to pay the terminal benefits to the petitioners herein pertaining to the late husband of the petitioner NO.1 who was dismissed from service on 21.3.1995, pending disposal of the main W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G.SAI LOCHAN 2. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 3. . 4. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL) The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner reported that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS