No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 2311 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Devesh Upreti, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The applicant – Inderjeet Singh, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 0190 of 2025, under Sections 8, 21, 29 of 60 of NDPS Act, registered at P.S.- Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. 4. Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court, the Investigating Officer is present through V.C. before this Court today. 5. In this case, an FIR was lodged on 04.10.2025 by the complainant/Sub-Inspector Manoj Singh Dev, wherein, the applicant was arrested with 254 grams of smack. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has falsely been implicated in the case as he was apprehended at 16:45 hours on 04.10.2025 and thereafter inventory was prepared on the spot and he was arrested and arrest memo was also prepared on the spot. Subsequently, FIR was lodged at 22:10 hours i.e. almost after four hours after the arrest of the applicant, but, the inventory as well as the arrest memo contains the FIR number. 7. On this basis, it is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case; that no contraband was recovered from the possession of the applicant and the whole recovery is doubtful. 8. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Admittedly, the inventory was prepared on the spot while FIR was lodged four hours after that and the FIR number is mentioned in the inventory report which creates serious doubt in the prosecution story. Besides this, the applicant has no previous criminal history. 10. Having considered the submissions, under the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the inventory was prepared on the spot while FIR was lodged four hours after that and the FIR number is mentioned in the inventory report, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 11. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 12. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall attend the trial Court regularly, and, he will not seek any unnecessary adjournment. ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case. iii) The applicant shall not leave India without any prior permission of the trial Court. 10. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail. (Alok Mahra J.) 17.04.2026 Ujjwal