[2025:RJ-JP:3353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2608/2024 1. Raju Son Of Puran Singh, Resident Of Village Dhaundhe Ke Pura Police Station Badi, District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) 2. Chandrabhan @ Attha Son Of Kirtiram, Resident Of Village Dhaundhe Ke Pura Police Station Badi, District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Jaipal Singh Son Of Ratan Lal, Resident Of Dhaundhe Ka Pura, Police Station Badi, District Dholpur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Order 23/01/2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is against refusal of grant of regular bail by order dated 03.09.2024 passed in Sessions Case No.73/12 in FIR No.321/2008 registered with Police Station Badi, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 of IPC and Section 3-1(10), 3-2(5) of SC/ST Act. 3. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. After surrender, the accused-appellants are in jail since last one year. No other instance of misuse of bail is there. Notice to respondent No.2 has already been served. [2025:RJ-JP:3353] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-2608/2024] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal. 5. Considering the facts of this case, this appeal stands allowed. 6. Accordingly, impugned order dated 03.09.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Dholpur (Rajasthan) is set-aside and it is directed that the above named accused-appellants be released on bail in the aforesaid FIR, if they are not wanted in any other case, provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with following conditions:- (i) the appellants shall fully co-operate in the trial, failing which, the trial judge would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the appellants. (ii) the appellants shall not leave the Country without permission of the trial Court otherwise it would amount to disobedience of the order of this Court and would amount for cancellation of bail. (BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 29-Nitin/Jaipur/-