Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30195 (KAR)

KAVYASHREE K C v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

RFA/1702/2016 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1029 RFA No. 1702 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1702 OF 2016 (DEC) BETWEEN: KAVYASHREE.K.C. D/O CHANDRAKANTH.K.L., AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O NO.17, SUBRAMANYA LAYOUT, 1ST CROSS, SHETTYHALLI, ABBIGERE, BANGALORE-560 015. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H.N.VIDYADHARA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE SECRETARY, KARNATAKA SECONDARY EDUCATION, EXAMINATION BOARD, 1ST FLOOR, 6TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, BANGALORE SOUTH, FEDERAL BUILDING, OPPOSITE KIMS, KALYASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560 002. 4. THE HEAD MASTER, MODEL EDUCATION SOCIETY HIGH SCHOOL, 10TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1029 RFA No. 1702 of 2016 BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE-560 011. 5. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, 18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., HCGP FOR R1 TO 3 & 5; R2-NOTICE TO R1-DISPENSED WITH V/O DT:14.07.2017; R4-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1029 RFA No. 1702 of 2016 The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47