IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16159 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.11.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Dr. Archna Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Harish Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel, for respondent No.4. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent developments, present petition as rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of accordingly. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 20, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?