1 2025:CGHC:27987 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6244 of 2025 1 - Smt. Neetu Singh Parihar W/o Shri Vinod Singh Parihar Aged About 40 Years Posted As Lecturer, At- Govt. Hr. Sec, School, Datrenga, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh H.Q.- Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director/ The President Divisional Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Education Division, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector/ President District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents 2025:CGHC:27989 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6256 of 2025 1 - Kishore Kumar Deshmukh S/o Lakhan Lal Aged About 41 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Middle School, Jevra Sirsa, Block And District Durg (C.G.) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh H. Q. Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director, Education Division, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Collector/president, District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary District Yuktiyutkaran Samiti, Durg, District Durg C.G. ... Respondents 2025:CGHC:27991 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6263 of 2025 1 - Smt. Nilima Verma W/o Ravindra Verma Aged About 38 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher At P.S. Gopalpur Para No. 10 Block Pithoura District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director State Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of School Education Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector / President District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - The District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate. 3 For State-Respondents : Mr. Santosh Bharat and Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 26-06-2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the 4 same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. Till representation of petitioners are decided, there shall be status quo as it exists today so far as transfer of present petitioners are concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil