Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30188 (CAL)

BIMAL PAL v. REKHA RANI MURMU

WPCRC/9/2025 · 2025-02-28

Shampa Sarkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.02.2025 Sl. No.01(DL) Cp WPCRC 9 of 2025 In W.P.A No. 15213 of 2022 Bimal Pal Versus Rekha Rani Murmu & Ors. Mr. Lalratan Mandal, Mr. Dilip Kumar Sadhu …For the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. Indranuj Dutta Mr. Atanu Basu Ms. Benazir Sk. ….for the alleged contemnor nos. 3 & 4. Alleged contemnor nos. 3 and 4 are present before this Court and apologize for the delay in complying with the order of the Court. The affidavit of compliance is taken on record. From the affidavit of compliance, it appears that the exercise to be undertaken by the gram panchayat is complete and having found that part of the building is unauthorized, the matter has been referred to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jhargram for necessary steps, in accordance with Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the Rule is discharged. 2 Contempt application is disposed of. Needless to mention, the Court expects that the Sub- Divisional Officer, Jhargram shall do the needful in accordance with law. (Shampa Sarkar, J. )