1 2025:CGHC:27840 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6112 of 2025 1 - Naresh Kumar Bhuarya S/o Mr. Ballu Ram Bhuarya Aged About 50 Years Post Lecturer Local Body, Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Lohattar, Block Durgukondal, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. 2 - Director, Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. 3 - The Collector and President District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker C.G. 4 - District Education Officer Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker C.G. 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker C.G. 6 - Joint Director, Education, Division Baster Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar C.G. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25-06-2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner and if the petitioner is not granted interim relief, he will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner has been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. She would further submit that if the petitioner is having any grievance, he may move fresh representation before the concerned Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 1st July, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner within seven days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the petitioner, the impugned transfer order issued under Teacher Rationalization Instructions, so far as the petitioner is concerned, be kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil