Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30173 (KAR)

M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18749/2025 · 2025-06-27

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22674 WP No. 18749 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18749 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S.MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.1, NELSON MANDELA MARG VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI - 110 070. ALSO AT ZONAL OFFICE (SOUTH) UNIT 1001, 11TH FLOOR, SKAV 909, 9/1, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. VENKATARAJ …PETITIONER (BY SMT. MONICA PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MS BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22674 WP No. 18749 of 2025 BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA TUBAGERE DODDABALLAPURA ROAD-561203. 3. THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK NELAMANGALA - 562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION S FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE EVICTION ORDER DATED JUNE 02, 2025 BEARING NO. LNDSONCR/47/24 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22674 WP No. 18749 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 02.06.2025 at (Annexure-'A') passed by respondent No.3. 3. It is contended by Smt.Monica Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, the impugned order at Annexure-'A' has been passed without issuing notice to the petitioner herein. 4. Per contra, Sri.Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents sought to justify the impugned order at Annexure-'A'. 5. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22674 WP No. 18749 of 2025 appearing for the parties, the order at Annexure-A dated 02.06.2025, passed by respondent No.3, be considered as a Show Cause Notice to the petitioner herein and the petitioner is directed to file the objections / reply to Annexure-'A' within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, respondent No.3 shall take decision in the matter after considering the reply / objection that may be filed by the petitioner herein in accordance with law. It is also made clear that, till the consideration of the reply / objection that may be filed by the petitioner herein, no precipitative action will be taken against the petitioner. 6. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VMB