[2025:RJ-JP:38483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14329/2025 Sudhir Kumar Agrawal, Proprietor Of M/s Sudhir Traders Having Its Office At Khasra No. 1656 G, Nagla Mohan Lal, Mauja Naraich, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, 282006 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Director Of Industries Cum Chairman, Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Jaipur, Udhyog Bhawan, Jaipur - 302005 (Rajasthan) 2. Rishabh Gokhru, Proprietor Of M/s Karan Industries Having Its Office At Plot No.15, Building -Karan Industries, Pur Road, Kanchi Resort, Bhilwara, Rajasthan - 311001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naved Rafiq For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 19/09/2025 1. Present petition is filed against the minutes of meeting dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure-13) and minutes of meeting dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-14). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a purchaser from the respondent-supplier. It is further submitted that respondent No.2 who is grand-son of erstwhile proprietor M/s Karan Industries is having no locus as in the Will of the erstwhile proprietor, only rights qua certain piece of land in business are dealt with. It is further submitted that the objection qua the same, was time barred and was not carried out within a [2025:RJ-JP:38483] (2 of 2) [CW-14329/2025] period of one year. Hence, as of now, the said proceedings are barred by the provisions of the Limitation Act, as the said period is already lapsed. 3. Having heard the submissions passed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon a perusal of the material available on record, specially the minutes of meeting dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure-13) and minutes of meeting dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-14), it is noted that the MSME authorities are considering the matter and conclusion qua the same is yet to be formulated. Therefore, the present petition is pre-mature for invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court. 4. Howsoever, petitioner will be at liberty to argue the objection pertaining to lapse of all proceedings and locus of respondent No.2 or other persons, before the appropriate authorities who are duty bound to pass a speaking order. 5. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 6. It is clarified that no prejudice will caused on account of the said disposal. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/15