Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30167 (PNJ)

LUXMI DEVI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5090/2023 · 2025-07-14

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT LUXMI DEVI STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR Present Mr. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. * SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ petition challenging the Rules has become infructuous as the petitioners were not allowed to participate that the issue should remain open if nee 2. Granting the liberty as Writ Petition stands 3. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. July 14, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LUXMI DEVI AND OTHERS V STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ petition challenging the Rules has become infructuous as the petitioners were not allowed to participate in the selection process. H issue should remain open if need so arises. Granting the liberty as prayed for hereinabove Writ Petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. [SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA [MEENAKSHI I. 2025 Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5090-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision 14thJuly, 2025 ..…...Petitioner(s) V/s. .....Respondent(s) SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA P.R. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ petition challenging the Rules has become infructuous as the petitioners in the selection process. However, he prays d so arises. prayed for hereinabove, the present as having been rendered infructuous. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA] JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA] JUDGE : Yes / No : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2025.07.15 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document