249-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16235-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2025 HARSH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr, Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Sarabha, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Raghav Bali, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Bali, advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J (Oral): 1. Learned counsel for petitioners states that present petition for quashing of FIR No.114, dated 26.07.2020, under Sections 425, 323, 427, 506 and 34 of IPC registered at Police Station Khanna City-II, Police District Khanna (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising/emanating out of the impugned FIR on the basis of voluntary compromise deed (Annexure P-2) has rendered infructuous as later on the matter was compromised. Therefore, he has instructions to withdraw present petition and accordingly, withdraws the same 2. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 08.05.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.05.09 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document